How
are we doing?
Crime has been declining in both the
nation and the state. The causes given
for these declines include more law
enforcement personnel, tougher sentencing
laws, and the aging of the population
- i.e., fewer young men in the crome-prone
ages of late teens, twenties, and
early thirties.
The California Crime Index, which
consists of violent and property crimes
* fell by 32%, 29%, and 26% in the
state, the Los Angeles region, and
the Bay Area, respectively, between
1991 and 1997. In the Central Valley,
however, crime decreased by only 13%
during this period. Between 1996 and
1997, crime fell by less than 1% in
the Central Valley, while it fell
by 7% and 11% in the state and the
Los Angeles region, respectively.
Within the Central Valley, the Sacramento
and San Joaquin regions had very similar
incidences of crime (see line graphs).
Between 1996 and 1997, however, crime
rose 2% in the former while it declined
3% in the latter. North Valley has
not only had the lowest crime per
capita of the three subregions, but
its trent in indicence of crime has
been distinctive from those of the
other two subregions (see line graphs).
Between 1988 and 1991, crime declined
26% there while it rose 7% and 8%
in the Sacramento and San Joaquin
regions, respectively. Between 1996
and 1997, however, crime increased
10% in North Valley.
* Violent Crimes consist
of Willfull Homicide, Forcible Rape,
Robbery, and Aggravated Assault. Property
Crimes consist of Burglary and Moter
Vehicle Theft. |